Southern Poverty Law Center cuts 60 jobs, union says it stashed cash, some call it "the biggest bully in the room"

According to reports in Yahoo!, CNN, Fox News, AP and more, the radical, Montgomery, Alabama-based Southern Poverty Law Center recently slashed more than 60 employees. In addition, union officials related to the organization say it stashed cash.

Long known for its fierce and radical labeling of so-called “hate groups” that included Catholic and evangelical entities, common sense members of Congress and even radio hosts with whom the group disagreed, the once-indomitable Southern Poverty Law Center now seems to be scrambling to survive, let along retain its self-declared dispenser of its own definition of justice.

Despite a scandal in 2019 that ousted its leadership, “SPLC annual revenue still reaches nine figures, and its assets are just shy of $700 million,”the Capital Research Center reports.

Columnist Robert Knight, in the Washington Times clarifies the group’s “hate” targets. “Three cheers for Moms for Liberty,” Knight writes…”The Moms last year were designated partly because they supported reform-minded school board candidates who won elections.

Knight continues:

The hate list includes the Family Research Council, American Family Association, Mission: America, Family Foundation of Virginia, Alliance Defending Freedom, and other pro-family, faith-based groups, along with national security groups such as the Center for Security Policy (“anti-Muslim”) and the Center for Immigration Studies (“anti-immigrant”).
The ‘hate map’ also includes the Ku Klux Klan, neo-Nazis, skinheads, and other extremist and violence-prone nutcases, which is the whole point of the conservative groups being lumped in with them — guilt by association.
As The Washington Times has reported, missing from the map are any of the anti-Israel, pro-Palestinian groups like the Escalate Network, which backs the terrorist group Hamas and pushes policies that would amount to a second holocaust of Jews in Israel.
Also missing are Black Lives Matter and Antifa, which spearheaded massive rioting in 2020 after George Floyd was killed.
If this were just a list compiled by one of the many crackpots out there, it wouldn’t matter much. But being tagged a “hate group” by the SPLC has real implications.
The FBI has cited the SPLC as a source in targeting terrorist threats. For instance, the agency’s Richmond, Virginia, bureau issued a memo warning about people who hold to “radical traditionalist Catholic ideology.”
Our armed forces and federal agencies have used SPLC materials in “diversity” programs, and some have banned Christian speakers and groups over the SPLC’s “hate group” label.
One of them, D. James Kennedy Ministries, which recently reverted to its original name, Coral Ridge Ministries, filed a federal defamation lawsuit in 2017. But a U.S. District Court rejected the claim, saying the SPLC has a First Amendment right to label Coral Ridge a “hate group.”
As a “public figure,” Coral Ridge had to prove three elements, according to Cornell’s Legal Information Institute: “The ‘hate group’ designation had to be (1) provably false, (2) actually false, and (3) made with ‘actual malice.’”
I think accusing someone falsely of “hate” in the current climate constitutes a hateful act in and of itself and is arguably defamatory. But the court threw it out, saying the term “hate group” has “a highly debatable and ambiguous meaning.’
Really? Not so ambiguous that the AmazonSmile charities program banned Coral Ridge Ministries.
Coral Ridge appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which refused to review an appeals court’s upholding of the district court ruling that the group had not plausibly alleged that the SPLC acted with “actual malice.”
No, of course not. Vilifying some good people falsely to the point of public ostracization that damages their ability to raise funds is downright friendly, right?
In a dissent, Justice Clarence Thomas said: “I would grant certiorari in this case to revisit the ‘actual malice’ standard. This case is one of many showing how New York Times and its progeny have allowed media organizations and interest groups ‘to cast false aspersions on public figures with near impunity.’”
In the case of Moms for Liberty, the group’s unforgivable sin is being “hateful” and “anti-government” for advocating more parent input into school curricula and books that push LGBTQ behavior on children.
The Southern Poverty Law Center said Moms for Liberty are “banning books, protesting drag story hours and using school boards as political battlegrounds.” Good for them.
Apparently, the only people qualified to speak at school board meetings are those approved by the SPLC.
Other groups have sued, but only one — the Georgia-based Dustin Inman Society — has an ongoing case, thanks to U.S. District Judge W. Keith Watkins, who ruled last year that it could proceed…. READ FULL article here>>